On Wednesday, September 11, 2002, at 08:49 AM, Andrew Gallatin wrote: Jim Magee writes: That's just the way BSD headers do things. To change it would break BSD [in-kernel] compatibility. But having BSD [in-kernel] compatibility also implies something else. As you will see, the definition of struct ipovly [the type for the ti_i field] is marked __APPLE_API_PRIVATE. That's you indicator that you have to be prepared to have your software track the OS on a release-for-release basis. I see your point, but ipovly is not a good example. Unless you're planning to reimpliment IP so that you can't talk to anybody else, I doubt that ipovly will be changing much ;) I think 'ipovly' is an implementation-specific thing, and does not affect wire content. Regards, Justin -- Justin C. Walker, Curmudgeon-At-Large * Institute for General Semantics | If you're not confused, | You're not paying attention *--------------------------------------*-------------------------------* _______________________________________________ darwin-kernel mailing list | darwin-kernel@lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/darwin-kernel Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.