site_archiver@lists.apple.com Delivered-To: darwin-kernel@lists.apple.com Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=cs.duke.edu; s=mail; t=1229353399; bh=KbypKlq8DPdg2VVKcpr9Ye5BRElkvDtzKIlUwGLgZIw=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=gN8AROA6PpHH Ykl030+0pDmeitOsLF3Gi3nAoiq1nsKAFbbjmUBjf1111g3e1WcNWLmtTxbm2Azn4uB oA+t/Os7DG8HbzB+te2oyCpxYsGoEt5r61/S3RtNZPYUh57GV63E3rQqBId8a7Nl2yH 8yG62cdbH/mUTB61ssJ0uI7YY= User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080724) Amanda Walker wrote:

No, they have not. Darwin has never used the "FreeBSD kernel API". At least for network drivers, it was pretty close before the mbuf and ifnet obfuscations were added in 10.4. Before these obfuscations, I wrote a device driver for an HPC interconnect which does ethernet emulation (really encapsulation) which shared the ethernet driver transmit and receive code between FreeBSD, MacOSX, and Tru64. Drew

Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Darwin-kernel mailing list (Darwin-kernel@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/darwin-kernel/site_archiver%40lists.a... This email sent to site_archiver@lists.apple.com