Re: thread_t, uthread_t, at al.?
site_archiver@lists.apple.com Delivered-To: darwin-kernel@lists.apple.com Hi, all thus my intuition was good , a wrong way/approach I'm less and less impressed with the overall design of Unix/Darwin APIs and code I'm more and more impressed, except about some little points ... but it's not the question here XNU opened a way in the Kernel design if you are interested by Kernel design learn other kernels ... and you 'll can compare : Hi Mike Windows Kernel too :D ... you can share your point of view but you cannot to say : "XNU is bad" ! XNU is not perfect but XNU is really good Peace -plum _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Darwin-kernel mailing list (Darwin-kernel@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/darwin-kernel/site_archiver%40lists.a... in first : I thought that you wanted to implement a code concerning another kernel "this approach exists on other nix*ss" I'm walking the VFS data structures looking for the processes that have files open. for my opinion an other interesting view about "NEw" kernel design is DragonFlyBSD and the LWKT model There is more than thirty years times thousands of engineers worth of design and experience embodied in the Darwin kernel, and to say that you're "not impressed" because you don't understand it and/or it doesn't satisfy your presumptions ... it's like saying you're not impressed by the Hoover Dam because it's "just concrete". 8) This email sent to site_archiver@lists.apple.com
participants (1)
-
plumber Idraulico