site_archiver@lists.apple.com Delivered-To: darwin-kernel@lists.apple.com Can we stop the lecture from self declared experts on what Open Source means? This isn't an advocacy list.... it's a technical list. mark -- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mark F. Murphy, Director Software Development <mailto:markm@tyrell.com> Tyrell Software Corp <http://www.tyrell.com> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Darwin-kernel mailing list (Darwin-kernel@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/darwin-kernel/site_archiver%40lists.a... At 3:50 PM +0100 3/23/07, Andreas Fink wrote: That's what someone would expect if its OPEN source. Otherwise the kernel should be declared CLOSED source as its source is not revealed (or at least the difference between the released binary and the released source). This email sent to site_archiver@lists.apple.com