On Wednesday, March 13, 2002, at 09:01 PM, Corey O'Connor wrote: Hmmm.. Must be just the view I get from CVSWeb. I'll check out the latest sources and look around. Thanks! The kernel source is not a 'live' repository. Rather, it gets updated from inside Apple on a (more or less) regular basis. The tricky part for those on the outside is to determine what versions (based on CVS tag) are worth building and trying out on a given installed system. Your best bet to get a kernel that works with, say, 10.1.3, is to check out tag Apple-201-19. It's possible that something like Apple-222 will work, although I haven't tried it. In general, if you don't know that a specific tag will work with your installed system, you are on thin ice if you try it. That's not a reason to avoid it, but forewarned is I forget just what... Regarding your question about what work remains, Jim's message points you in the right direction (check the bug list available at the darwin website: http://publicsource.apple.com/projects/bugs.html). Thinking that there's no more work to do in the kernel is like thinking we have solved the outstanding problems in particle physics. Regards, Justin -- Justin C. Walker, Curmudgeon-At-Large * Institute for General Semantics | If you're not confused, | You're not paying attention *--------------------------------------*-------------------------------* _______________________________________________ darwin-kernel mailing list | darwin-kernel@lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/darwin-kernel Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.