site_archiver@lists.apple.com Delivered-To: darwin-kernel@lists.apple.com - Kevin On Jun 2, 2005, at 10:45 PM, John Davidorff Pell wrote: JP On 2 Jun 2005, at 12:52, Kevin Van Vechten wrote: _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Darwin-kernel mailing list (Darwin-kernel@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/darwin-kernel/site_archiver%40lists.a... Obviously there's a difference that prompted you to ask if you could build the "full" version in the first place. My response is true, and I know because I post the source code archives. Is this true? I never knew that XNU was different between the editions. I do know that many kexts are binary only. Is this speculation or knowledge? Do you have references... No, it is not possible. Apple does not release the entire source code of the mach_kernel. However, there is rarely any practical difference, and I haven't personally encountered any problems using a Darwin kernel on Mac OS X. This email sent to site_archiver@lists.apple.com