Re: Q: Darwin panicing too soon?
On woensdag, aug 6, 2003, at 16:12 Europe/Brussels, Jim Magee wrote: [1]. The i386 kernel still maps the kernel as part of each task, so it's kernel virtual space is still much smaller (and the application's available virtual space is also smaller). The PowerPC kernel has separate 4GB address spaces for the kernel vs. each application. Are there more juicy tidbits like this you can share with the list? The Unix section on Panther at apple.com isn't exactly all-telling :) Also, the WWDC sessions at connect.apple.com (which I can't watch yet as student member, but I can see the titles already) on the Core OS don't seem to include any kernel architectural improvement sessions. And is there maybe a technote about this kind of stuff planned? (a bit like <http://developer.apple.com/technotes/tn2002/tn2053.html> on Mac OS X 10.2) Jonas _______________________________________________ darwin-kernel mailing list | darwin-kernel@lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/darwin-kernel Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
participants (1)
-
Jonas Maebe