site_archiver@lists.apple.com Delivered-To: darwin-kernel@lists.apple.com This doesn't involve kernels, AFAICT. Gak! Not Open Transport again? Regards, Justin -- Justin C. Walker, Curmudgeon-At-Large Institute for General Semantics -------- When LuteFisk is outlawed, Only outlaws will have LuteFisk -------- _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Darwin-kernel mailing list (Darwin-kernel@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/darwin-kernel/site_archiver%40lists.a... On Jul 20, 2005, at 02:54 , Graham J Lee wrote: On 19 Jul 2005, at 20:58, Justin Walker wrote: On Jul 19, 2005, at 12:48, Gottfried Zojer wrote: Just curious if somebody is out there thinking to merge a darwinOS Kernel to a OpenSolaris kernel on x86 system. you might get more enjoyment from poking yourself in the eye with a sharp stick :-} Last I looked, Solaris was System V.4-based, while Darwin is FreeBSD+Mach based. It's all just software of course, but it seems like a lot of work for little reward. Why are you thinking about this? What, in particular, would get "merged"? Do you mean something like shuffling two decks of cards together, or making a marble cake? Justin, while this is only at best marginally related to what I think the OP was saying, I can think of a number of reasons to want to glue Slowlaris and Darwin together: * launchd or asl on Solaris * Solaris TCP/IP for Darwin The rest seems like more non-kernel issues. In any case, the code's there for those that want to work on it, but, as you say, there doesn't seem to be anything compelling here. This email sent to site_archiver@lists.apple.com