September 2008 - Installer-dev

Re: Problem when building pmdoc files from command line
by John Gee 30 Sep '08

30 Sep '08

site_archiver(a)lists.apple.com Delivered-To: installer-dev(a)lists.apple.com On 30/09/2008, at 00:13 , sandeep chaudhary wrote: but i am getting these messages- -- John Gee, ADInstruments Programmers live in interesting times... _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Installer-dev mailing list (Installer-dev(a)lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/installer-dev/site_archiver%40lists.… I think the crash was fixed by passing identifier on command line. I am just replying to the messages part: 2008-09-29 16:55:33.770 packagemaker[8048:10b] Setting to : 0 (null) 2008-09-29 16:55:33.775 packagemaker[8048:10b] Setting to : 1 RadiumGlow.redgiantsoftware.aftereffectscs3.aftereffectscs3.pkg 2008-09-29 16:55:33.777 packagemaker[8048:10b] relocate: (null) 0 I get three messages per package in same style as yours, and have not found out anything about them. 2008-09-29 11:11:37.638 packagemaker[77606:a0b] Setting to : 0 (null) 2008-09-29 11:11:37.642 packagemaker[77606:a0b] Setting to : 1 adinstruments.com.pkg 2008-09-29 11:11:37.647 packagemaker[77606:a0b] relocate: (null) 0 This email sent to site_archiver(a)lists.apple.com

1 0

Re: some alarming PackageMaker / Installer behaviour
by John Gee 30 Sep '08

30 Sep '08

site_archiver(a)lists.apple.com Delivered-To: installer-dev(a)lists.apple.com -- John Gee, ADInstruments Programmers live in interesting times... _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Installer-dev mailing list (Installer-dev(a)lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/installer-dev/site_archiver%40lists.… The default behaviour for applications added to projects is that they are "relocatable". This does not work well on development computers, where there are routinely multiple versions, including the version freshly built. Look in the "Components" tab of the project contents for the "Allow Relocation" checkbox column, and try turning that off. On a closely related note, you may discover after changing the setting that it will not stick. In that case, switching the contents from project relative paths to absolute paths is likely to make the setting stick. This email sent to site_archiver(a)lists.apple.com

1 0

Re: previous version clobbering newer version?
by Bill Janssen 30 Sep '08

30 Sep '08

site_archiver(a)lists.apple.com Delivered-To: Installer-dev(a)lists.apple.com Lisa Weimer <LisaWeimer(a)smarttech.com> wrote: > I was really hoping there was some way to tell the package containd in a > metapackage to do the Right Thing-- when an old package encounters a new > one, just leave the newer packages completely alone. I think it is doing 'the right thing'. Often packages in a meta-package have to work together, and co-depend on specific versions. The 'newer' version of one of the packages may break that. But there should be a plist option somewhere to control this. Bill _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Installer-dev mailing list (Installer-dev(a)lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/installer-dev/site_archiver%40lists.… This email sent to site_archiver(a)lists.apple.com

1 0

some alarming PackageMaker / Installer behaviour
by Jason Proctor 29 Sep '08

29 Sep '08

site_archiver(a)lists.apple.com Delivered-To: installer-dev(a)lists.apple.com #pragma list-newbie before i carry on with more detail etc, is this a known issue? thanks muchly _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Installer-dev mailing list (Installer-dev(a)lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/installer-dev/site_archiver%40lists.… i'm seeing some rather alarming behaviour after upgrading from MacOS 10.4.11 to 10.5.5 and XCode 3.1.1. first, it seems like XCode brings along with it PackageMaker 3.0.3, which immediately obsoleted all my happy .pmproj files. i'm not really seeing why this was necessary, but anyway, reauthoring the PM projects didn't take too long. but then when i ran the installer packages that PM created, i didn't find the applications in /Applications as i expected. it occurred to me to check the Console for any log messages that the installer had dropped on its way to not putting things where it should, and i got a shock. the first time i ran the installer, it installed into another of my applications in /Applications. i thought this was a bit off, but put it down to my migration process. i might have put the wrong application name in, etc. so i went and rechecked all that stuff again, same result. also i noticed that some components were being installed back into their *source* locations, rather than going to their *destination* location (ie /Applications). so i thought OK, what happens if i remove the overwritten application? the third time i ran the installer, i got a big shock. check this log message out -- 9/29/08 3:34:11 PM pkgExtractor[42357] Diverting "./Notifier.app/Contents/Resources/English.lproj" to "/Users/jason/am_install/dist/mac/PackageRoot/Applications/Notifier.app/Contents/Resources/English.lproj" hmmm. now am_install is an old repository which is not used any more, and has no relation whatsoever to the application being installed. i wonder whether if i removed am_install from my home directory, would the installer then go and find another such hierarchy to install into? at this point i started to get really worried, as i can't deploy to Mac under these circumstances. This email sent to site_archiver(a)lists.apple.com

1 0

Fw: Problem when building pmdoc files from command line
by sandeep chaudhary 29 Sep '08

29 Sep '08

site_archiver(a)lists.apple.com Delivered-To: installer-dev(a)lists.apple.com Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=LmjjRBY7yuoKPVmahdspMUOVafuj04mWR7NK1n4evpNVtLobRLF9IDvLOfcotGv/TpHYkmgAnWKVYv2/4iOeJnq8PnUYb4BN2J1JNxlbl+xOUNc4Ug1IQG+K4tmkQUB02LVmNhTq7e/9DJdXdEI7wwZk3hCjAZ6I6v9cJtKzIag=; > > Hi All, > > > > I'm attempting to build a basic packagemaker file > from > > the command line on leopard(10.5) using- > > > > "/Developer/usr/bin/packagemaker --doc > > /Applications/Installers/Radium\ > > Glow/ProjectFiles/AfterEffectsCS3.pmdoc --out > > /Applications/Installers/Radium\ > > Glow/Packages/AfterEffectsCS3.pkg > > > > > > but i am getting these messages- > > > 2008-09-29 16:55:33.770 packagemaker[8048:10b] Setting to : > 0 (null) > 2008-09-29 16:55:33.775 packagemaker[8048:10b] Setting to : > 1 > RadiumGlow.redgiantsoftware.aftereffectscs3.aftereffectscs3.pkg > 2008-09-29 16:55:33.777 packagemaker[8048:10b] relocate: > (null) 0 > 2008-09-29 16:55:38.611 packagemaker[8076:10b] Setting to : > 0 (null) > 2008-09-29 16:55:38.615 packagemaker[8076:10b] Setting to : > 1 > RadiumGlow.redgiantsoftware.aftereffects70.aftereffects7.pkg > 2008-09-29 16:55:38.619 packagemaker[8076:10b] relocate: > (null) 0 > 2008-09-29 16:55:42.893 packagemaker[8104:10b] Setting to : > 0 (null) > 2008-09-29 16:55:42.897 packagemaker[8104:10b] Setting to : > 1 > RadiumGlow.redgiantsoftware.premiereprocs3.premireprocs3.pkg > 2008-09-29 16:55:42.900 packagemaker[8104:10b] relocate: > (null) 0 > 2008-09-29 16:55:46.792 packagemaker[8132:10b] Setting to : > 0 (null) > 2008-09-29 16:55:46.796 packagemaker[8132:10b] Setting to : > 1 RadiumGlow.redgiantsoftware.finalcutpro.finalcutpro.pkg > 2008-09-29 16:55:46.799 packagemaker[8132:10b] relocate: > (null) 0 > 2008-09-29 16:55:50.681 packagemaker[8157:10b] Setting to : > 0 (null) > 2008-09-29 16:55:50.685 packagemaker[8157:10b] Setting to : > 1 RadiumGlow.redgiantsoftware.applemotion.applemotion.pkg > 2008-09-29 16:55:50.687 packagemaker[8157:10b] relocate: > (null) 0 > 2008-09-29 16:55:54.472 packagemaker[8181:10b] Setting to : > 0 (null) > 2008-09-29 16:55:54.476 packagemaker[8181:10b] Setting to : > 1 RadiumGlow.redgiantsoftware.avidavx.avidavx.pkg > 2008-09-29 16:55:54.480 packagemaker[8181:10b] relocate: > (null) 0 > 2008-09-29 16:55:58.388 packagemaker[8208:10b] Setting to : > 0 (null) > 2008-09-29 16:55:58.396 packagemaker[8208:10b] Setting to : > 1 RadiumGlow.redgiantsoftware.uninstaller.uninstaller.pkg > 2008-09-29 16:55:58.399 packagemaker[8208:10b] relocate: > (null) 0 > 2008-09-29 16:55:59.769 packagemaker[8213:10b] Setting to : > 0 (null) > 2008-09-29 16:55:59.771 packagemaker[8213:10b] Setting to : > 0 (null) > 2008-09-29 16:55:59.773 packagemaker[8213:10b] Setting to : > 1 radiumGlow.RedGiantSoftware.radiumglow.aftereffectscs3.pkg > 2008-09-29 16:55:59.775 packagemaker[8213:10b] Setting to : > 0 (null) > 2008-09-29 16:55:59.776 packagemaker[8213:10b] Setting to : > 0 (null) > 2008-09-29 16:55:59.778 packagemaker[8213:10b] Setting to : > 1 radiumGlow.RedGiantSoftware.radiumglow.aftereffects7.pkg > 2008-09-29 16:55:59.780 packagemaker[8213:10b] Setting to : > 0 (null) > 2008-09-29 16:55:59.780 packagemaker[8213:10b] Setting to : > 0 (null) > 2008-09-29 16:55:59.782 packagemaker[8213:10b] Setting to : > 1 radiumGlow.RedGiantSoftware.radiumglow.premiereprocs3.pkg > 2008-09-29 16:55:59.784 packagemaker[8213:10b] Setting to : > 0 (null) > 2008-09-29 16:55:59.784 packagemaker[8213:10b] Setting to : > 0 (null) > 2008-09-29 16:55:59.786 packagemaker[8213:10b] Setting to : > 1 radiumGlow.RedGiantSoftware.radiumglow.finalcutpro.pkg > 2008-09-29 16:55:59.789 packagemaker[8213:10b] Setting to : > 0 (null) > 2008-09-29 16:55:59.790 packagemaker[8213:10b] Setting to : > 0 (null) > 2008-09-29 16:55:59.792 packagemaker[8213:10b] Setting to : > 1 radiumGlow.RedGiantSoftware.radiumglow.applemotion.pkg > 2008-09-29 16:55:59.794 packagemaker[8213:10b] Setting to : > 0 (null) > 2008-09-29 16:55:59.795 packagemaker[8213:10b] Setting to : > 0 (null) > 2008-09-29 16:55:59.796 packagemaker[8213:10b] Setting to : > 1 radiumGlow.RedGiantSoftware.radiumglow.avidavx.pkg > 2008-09-29 16:55:59.798 packagemaker[8213:10b] Setting to : > 0 (null) > 2008-09-29 16:55:59.799 packagemaker[8213:10b] Setting to : > 0 (null) > 2008-09-29 16:55:59.800 packagemaker[8213:10b] Setting to : > 1 radiumGlow.RedGiantSoftware.radiumglow.uninstaller.pkg > > > > > Actually i am not sure that what was going wrong on my > > side. Could any one please tell me what these messages > means and > > when its comes? > > > > > > How can i compile the project file without theses > messages? > > > > Any type of help is very much appreciated > > > > Thanks > > -sandeep > > > > > > > > > > > > Bring your gang together. Do your thing. Find > your > > favourite Yahoo! group at > http://in.promos.yahoo.com/groups/ > > > > Unlimited freedom, unlimited storage. Get it now, on > http://help.yahoo.com/l/in/yahoo/mail/yahoomail/tools/tools-08.html/ Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go to http://in.messenger.yahoo.com/invite/ _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Installer-dev mailing list (Installer-dev(a)lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/installer-dev/site_archiver%40lists.… This email sent to site_archiver(a)lists.apple.com

1 0

Re: [Requirements/Javascript] Aren't some evaluations useless?
by Iceberg-Dev 28 Sep '08

28 Sep '08

site_archiver(a)lists.apple.com Delivered-To: installer-dev(a)lists.apple.com Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:mime-version:in-reply-to :references:content-type:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:from :subject:date:to:x-mailer; bh=MUDduONsgOHNOtzKvcTu1484tOlQ44hVse55Ybu5TEs=; b=m3vFcnB0+yK7oEowyqmJnoEUsBN9AYzGD/A1bDtNzzTxbtV7hx/6poTSuRUH4ibAXp W2+ODJbQvr7ACPYZEBLBVlu9ItZDpOgexnMOr11TooMOl4d4MqlvohexTLs9OMJo7ila 8Q3YZMH6lpH5N48LGRcbZfS/t/29xGeBCdNYA= Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id :content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=xDF3NvS8XgEuvTpPv/uxw3MUx3Phn9NKgp0gKGmd9SofEPRvPVi4zBiMW5O87DcTGz /aD0r9NpinHZFFTuYS2PeG1NPsc/5tx3Ej+oK2H0iyxLwjmCcSJEGpvrRkN8OFWDOA/F uwPiUZm0wrCRPBwd8hDnY81nZn9ySse9gIRw0= On Sep 29, 2008, at 12:27 AM, Iceberg-Dev wrote: [...] 1st strange point: ------------------ _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Installer-dev mailing list (Installer-dev(a)lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/installer-dev/site_archiver%40lists.… - my.result is not supported for state of choice related functions (if you use one, you get plenty of warnings in Installer.app logs). - if the start_selected function returns false, it does not prevent installation or a partition from being selected. So it can't prevent installation, it can't prevent a partition from being selected and it can't apparently display a warning or a stop message. Then is it because an InstallationCheck or VolumeCheck script could rely on the value of choices.[].selected that this function is evaluated? If this is the case, why is this function evaluated when it's never called by such a script? Regarding this part, I forgot to mention that part of the strangeness is that this function is evaluated as soon as the Introduction step and not after the target volume has been selected. This email sent to site_archiver(a)lists.apple.com

1 0

[Requirements/Javascript] Aren't some evaluations useless?
by Iceberg-Dev 28 Sep '08

28 Sep '08

site_archiver(a)lists.apple.com Delivered-To: installer-dev(a)lists.apple.com Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:content-type:to:from:subject :date:x-mailer; bh=Q8N/2aYR++ls7PKvCQl+dWDNOPDClkUrFAvBKD7Y6FI=; b=OsP5V+328vQpIcYGSgzPSZUEATSECbvABJix5X0POEWVQ4gvM7mhlClpx5Hsr/k29U 5DsRGfaROfESYVarWmmziY0iN1gVUGXS3OzP3al7s7uy8DHyc3m7fBkpOd6Kfin8svXv UHGcQFoL+ib5mGAfCegBCBi45nZ/zXHIAkoFY= Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:content-type:to :from:subject:date:x-mailer; b=ipoZyJhKahRED8FlwDFvmlV4JWXm2qlTmcEH3MvlflUFuVcVEdShwntALE5mauZvOb hv9hdMexq6GvnVtwjPiMh4Q7wJ3ZRj0mot3TkIlrskL2QGBDA7HlQxtPh8uSzXyENr++ q8KqHiGLeNPzWXsFk7Y0lsKbbBsRBddeHYkWM= This choice has the following "requirements": start_selected="test1()" start_enabled="true" start_visible="true" 1st strange point: ------------------ 2nd strange point: ------------------ If test1() returns true, test1() is called 9 times. If test1() returns false, test1() is called 27 times. <script> function test1() { system.log('test1'); return false; } </script> <choices-outline> <line choice="choice0"></line> </choices-outline> Let's say I have a distribution script with 1 choice. I have 9 disk partitions and running on Mac OS X 10.4.11. - my.result is not supported for state of choice related functions (if you use one, you get plenty of warnings in Installer.app logs). - if the start_selected function returns false, it does not prevent installation or a partition from being selected. So it can't prevent installation, it can't prevent a partition from being selected and it can't apparently display a warning or a stop message. Then is it because an InstallationCheck or VolumeCheck script could rely on the value of choices.[].selected that this function is evaluated? If this is the case, why is this function evaluated when it's never called by such a script? Why would there be additional evaluations if the returned value is false? --------------------8<--------------------8<--------------------8<------ --------------8<-------------------- <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <installer-gui-script minSpecVersion="1.0"> <title>Requirements Test</title> <options allow-external-scripts="no" customize="allow" rootVolumeOnly="false"></options> <choice id="choice0" title="Sample Choice" description="toto" start_selected="test1()" start_enabled="true" start_visible="true"> <pkg-ref id="ident.pkg.toto"></pkg-ref> </choice> <pkg-ref id="ident.pkg.toto" version="0.0.0.0.0" installKBytes="0" auth="None" onConclusion="None">file:./Contents/ Packages/toto.pkg</pkg-ref> </installer-gui-script> _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Installer-dev mailing list (Installer-dev(a)lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/installer-dev/site_archiver%40lists.… This email sent to site_archiver(a)lists.apple.com

1 0

[PackageMaker 3.0.3] Disk Space requirement...
by Iceberg-Dev 28 Sep '08

28 Sep '08

site_archiver(a)lists.apple.com Delivered-To: installer-dev(a)lists.apple.com Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:content-type:to:from:subject :date:x-mailer; bh=KTarXBXFola+c6VrqjaYwdEIcWbapWwSMeS/cdL6kl4=; b=h5Z2eyeE0rMf3PKRlibzWMVHCgkSv+nAJ+smwUH9qfxZfhSMGFN4GmVoiFc/GI47xr LlyQECjpNETJQqNDhziPfN2/+TLPvwQ70EuZemS0oMpPJ9OEC2Bd4D4DH9ISXm5hGFrw EsGJPlzVzE0aEVElZ+ozlouneQ1RZguGdEqZM= Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:content-type:to :from:subject:date:x-mailer; b=HDi8v0tttsbqnub6epJbng2RghhVVpBVSRxQJoJwuvmiFNyF8lCvzJz/k6cvoh1e9Y HYT0fA0HNELzE9bramxVLRA7d6NsVEBZdkydFGv+YhV9Kcj635fYktR/AwJWUS1XqSBN hq1xeGLKIVwF0RsprUQVB5nz7u7Z7ouVcZPZ4= If you select the following requirement: If Megabyte Available on Target is: == 1 You still end up with this script: ... result=true; ... AFAIK, 1 MB = 1024 KB != 1024 * 1024 KB [Bug ID# 6252974] _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Installer-dev mailing list (Installer-dev(a)lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/installer-dev/site_archiver%40lists.… result = result && (my.target.availableKiloBytes == 1 * 1024 * 1024); This email sent to site_archiver(a)lists.apple.com

1 0

Re: Version control in Installer Packages
by Iceberg-Dev 28 Sep '08

28 Sep '08

site_archiver(a)lists.apple.com Delivered-To: installer-dev(a)lists.apple.com Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:mime-version:in-reply-to :references:content-type:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:from :subject:date:to:x-mailer; bh=ge13YE3SbOLv9hXILvgP0YAWtKQOn127qsg/AupI0HU=; b=lrdBIkzvBB15bTYccbhcWhm6mn0HWK1weoxtpzBZ1iiWD89MsN4hkm3J3L8a7mQKi4 oRazMTph6Rr+bxzp74aeV34MWsjB88/2ILT5gKcLrpzRjjDbV78/itcYiQm/zT7v7Ipy mBjmx9PJiGgIM2sgn0QcbFBkg6w6UMZHtKXnY= Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id :content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=tLVEANmaMsH4fCRchEhiZtVAXr8enZ6Z3wwwcL9yn1hSYL0jBwWj8TLYE1eyMSnwhn H8qtmNYH44yfh4tzuoycT6zZGSKyHM3uU4SMglDMKfAQfjYRrYMLQeRvM5CROaXb9I8v SG0ZMGX967q4TFpaToHOoukf8VtUm65Os7V4o= On Sep 23, 2008, at 8:15 PM, Scott Amory wrote: On Sep 22, 2008, at 11:00 PM, Ulf Dunkel wrote: So we have set up the "Requirements" as follows: Required: required Pass if: true Description: Target OS Version: is greater than or equal to '10.4.5' This works fine when I test it on my Leopard machine (of course). if(!(my.target.systemVersion.ProductVersion >= '10.4.5')) { _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Installer-dev mailing list (Installer-dev(a)lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/installer-dev/site_archiver%40lists.… Our iCalamus installer for CD shipment has been set up in a way that it should check the customer's Mac OS X version first. But now a customer complained that it didn't work on his Tiger machine with 10.4.11. How the heck are values compared in "Requirements"? I guess they are compared as strings (where "10.4.11" is lower than "10.4.5"). Can someone confirm this as a bug - or did we something wrong? Hi Ulf, I'm sorry to say that I think that this is a bug in PackageMaker. I set up a test as you described and looked at the distribution file that it created. The check that it sets up looks like this: On the surface that might look correct but it isn't. In a situation when comparing this to 10.4.10 or higher it's going to give the incorrect answer. To be correct it would have to look something like this: if(-1 == system.compareVersions (my.target.systemVersion.ProductVersion, '10.4.5')) { Called this way it should properly compare the versions. The return code of the compareVersions function is -1 for less than 0 for equal and 1 for greater than. In your situation I would suggest you manually change the distribution after creating it through PM. And please file a bug for this. Just for the record, this incorrect way of comparing versions is also used in PackageMaker on Mac OS X 10.4. This email sent to site_archiver(a)lists.apple.com

1 0

Re: Migration from VISE to PackageMaker
by Stéphane Sudre 27 Sep '08

27 Sep '08

site_archiver(a)lists.apple.com Delivered-To: installer-dev(a)lists.apple.com On Sep 27, 2008, at 8:33 AM, Gu, Kevin wrote: Hi Stéphane, _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Installer-dev mailing list (Installer-dev(a)lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/installer-dev/site_archiver%40lists.… Many thanks. Although I haven't found when the short language name will be incorrect, I will take your suggestion And besides this topic, would you please shed some light on other topics, because I am really a new user of Package Maker, and the user guide is not enough for me. Regarding /Library/Receipts, if you're using a FLAT format (OS Target is 10.5), you won't get the same results as with old formats. Installer.app now keeps information in a SQLite3 data base. Regarding downgrading. With distribution scripts, I guess this is done through requirements now. I haven't investigated this part of requirements yet. Regarding configurations and permissions, it might "just" be a bug in PackageMaker or a features that requires to have saved the project on disk to get it working. This email sent to site_archiver(a)lists.apple.com

1 0