site_archiver@lists.apple.com Delivered-To: installer-dev@lists.apple.com samedi 7 mai 2005, à 06:26 PM, Chuck Soper a écrit : If you want to restrict installation to 10.4 and later, you can: _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Installer-dev mailing list (Installer-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/installer-dev/site_archiver%40lists.a... I'm afraid that having the requirement may prevent other users from installing and buying my software. Perhaps, I should remove the requirements dictionary from my installer entirely. Is it hurting more than helping? What do you think? IMHO, I think it's super useless for the following reason: it won't prevent users on 10.1 and 10.2 from installing your package since Requirements are available for 10.3 and later. - use a VolumeCheck script: you can find a lot of these things in Apple's packages. That's what I'm using for a package since Mac OS X 10.1.1 and it has yet to fail me. - create a distribution script package. This way, it might not even be possible to start installing it on OS prior to 10.3. I really wish that the PackageMaker application had a simple interface to specify at least the minimum OS version and that it worked > reliably. There's something like this I think for Distribution Scripts but I don't remember if it's for the destination volume or the running OS. The installer should be a developer's friend. It took a while to figure out how to add this requirements dictionary and the only thing it seems to have accomplished is to prevent potential customers from installing my demo software. Well, you know, with every installation solution, the motto is: "Build once, test everywhere". This email sent to site_archiver@lists.apple.com