site_archiver@lists.apple.com Delivered-To: installer-dev@lists.apple.com On Jul 16, 2008, at 7:10 PM, Bill Coderre wrote: The older format, called "bundle packages" work just fine on 10.5.x. (The Leopard+ only format is called "flat packages".) _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Installer-dev mailing list (Installer-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/installer-dev/site_archiver%40lists.a... Thanks everyone. So, what benefits are there really to "flat packages" ? It seems like the tools are buggy, they have less features, they only work on 10.5.... any insight? On Jul 16, 2008, at 3:13 PM, Stéphane Sudre wrote: How can I add my plugin to my distribution? If you're targetting OS X 10.5, you can't. The format does not support it. If you target OS X 10.4, you will be able to add it manually (or with a script) after building your package/metapackage. If I cannot do it, how can I revert to PackageMaker 2.0 and just create the old, folder-based installation packages? (the plugin is working fine with a sample folder-style pkg). If you need plugins, use bundle packages. In PackageMaker, tell it you're targeting 10.4. You can then set rules to disallow install on less than 10.5.4, for example. This email sent to site_archiver@lists.apple.com