site_archiver@lists.apple.com Delivered-To: installer-dev@lists.apple.com Thread-index: Act7MrXesgarIhP6SOaQGo/8GkLXIgAIEU8A Yes, thanks. I double-checked the min install OS, and it was 10.5 for the meta/main package. I'd only set it to 10.3 for the sub-packages. Thanks! I wonder why apple changed to a flat package. It use to be helpful sometimes to look in a package bundle when the install wasn't going well. Cheers

-----Original Message----- From: Iceberg-Dev [mailto:dev.iceberg@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 4:40 AM To: Michael Stauffer (Circular Logic) Cc: installer-dev@lists.apple.com Subject: Re: Error running a pkg on 10.3.9

...

Hi,

I've created a .pkg with PM 3 on 10.5. I set the pkg's minimum OS version as 10.3. It works fine on 10.5 and 10.6, but when I run on 10.3.9 (PMac G4), I get the error "the bill of materials for this package was not found".

Is the minimum OS version a requirement or the target OS?

...

The pkg contains two other packages. PM used to make a metapackage, but when I loaded the PM project into PM 3, it now builds only as a .pkg, not .mpkg. Is this part of the problem?

Also, the final output pkg is a file, not a bundle, which is also new to me. The sub packages I built with PM 3 are .pkg files too, but bundles. Is there something I set in one project but not the other that I haven't found?

If you get a file instead of a bundle, this could mean that the target OS has changed and is now 10.5 and you are building a flat package/distribution instead of a bundle package/metapackage.

_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Installer-dev mailing list (Installer-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/installer-dev/site_archiver%40lists.a... This email sent to site_archiver@lists.apple.com