site_archiver@lists.apple.com Delivered-To: macnetworkprog@lists.apple.com On Mar 30, 2010, at 1:52 AM, Hamish Allan wrote:

I'd have thought it was an implementation detail and therefore subject to change. It's also premature optimisation until you've done some profiling!

+1. This is, AFAIK, a proprietary protocol (on top of Bluetooth) so there’s not a lot of info about what goes over the wire. Anyway, latency is generally a bigger issue than bandwidth. Regardless of how much or little data can fit in a packet, it’s better to send data in larger chunks to minimize the overhead of having to wait for acknowledgement of each message. But as Hamish said: premature optimization. Just implement it first by doing “the simplest thing that could possibly work”, then try it out and see if it’s adequate. If not, optimize and iterate. —Jens _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Macnetworkprog mailing list (Macnetworkprog@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/macnetworkprog/site_archiver%40lists.... This email sent to site_archiver@lists.apple.com