Re: Reducing latency in TCP-based streams
site_archiver@lists.apple.com Delivered-To: macnetworkprog@lists.apple.com Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=t5mLLX7CWn8W1j/EtGEE3DO40ytlE82O5J2A0qXvTbk=; b=KLVzrCuJTRu2dPJPaz+aaNVZjKAuWGHygQZ14jwP1hs0xsQtdHguG4q7qc9Pi6iG8L EGZAHvj1kylyvAnGYCmwJshnsQ5zfimz49nqONfpbH1ueIzccZ9nBJUhC0S4r5heNIDI lP4AuaTTG4xhoVsdIg9smsW3+iojQdntEkONQ= Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=nR9Kb2Gg0s/ikrgiY9VrdD8AoLXZpbfNbSt4jXRwvNxTQwH7t7bS7IoyPWxPoa9jCV CIqLGdGBRvpWYLzNRxfOAQbBmnJTwWrJ80tFWNR6Ey7vVgZrH+LNE0QAeo5vrwuhpMZy PKZnamrVB1iyY+cn9eCtIsKEIX9g74kPTIV/I= All, I had accidentally replied personally to some of your instead of to the list. The various answers were very helpful, thank you all. To summarize: I was looking for simple solutions that I can implement in a few hours. I like to rely on TCP because I need a lossless delivery. UDP+RTP would get too complicated for now as it seems I'd have to invest much more time into that, I am afraid. The TCP_NODELAY option I will try out and see how it performs. That goes right along the solutions I had in mind. -- Thomas Tempelmann, http://www.tempel.org/ _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Macnetworkprog mailing list (Macnetworkprog@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/macnetworkprog/site_archiver%40lists.... This email sent to site_archiver@lists.apple.com
participants (1)
-
Thomas Tempelmann