site_archiver@lists.apple.com Delivered-To: pro-apps-dev@lists.apple.com Darrin, Where do we find the NONE 16? best, Dan DiPaola Co-Founder HD-encoding.com 818.859.7700 office 818.823.5500 cell dan@HD-encoding.com QualityNotQuantity On Aug 11, 2009, at 10:42 AM, Darrin Cardani wrote: <http://lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/quicktime-api> Darrin On Aug 11, 2009, at 10:34 AM, Dan DiPaola wrote: Team, What if we would like to try and stay in a 16 bit world? best, Dan DiPaola Co-Founder HD-encoding.com 818.859.7700 office 818.823.5500 cell dan@HD-encoding.com QualityNotQuantity On Aug 10, 2009, at 8:37 PM, Andreas Wittenstein wrote: Brian, http://www.bitjazz.com/sheervideo/ Andreas Wittenstein BitJazz Inc. http://www.bitjazz.com/ On 2009 Aug 10, at 12:44 , Brian Gardner wrote: Thanks, Darrin. There appears to be no way to test my plugins using a lossless QuickTime codec. _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Pro-apps-dev mailing list (Pro-apps-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/pro-apps-dev/hd444%40mac.com _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Pro-apps-dev mailing list (Pro-apps-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/pro-apps-dev/dcardani%40apple.com -- Darrin Cardani dcardani@apple.com _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Pro-apps-dev mailing list (Pro-apps-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/pro-apps-dev/site_archiver%40lists.ap... As mentioned, there's the None16 codec and the Microcosm codec. I know that the TIFF spec supports 16-bit per channel data, but I don't know if the QT TIFF codec supports it off the top of my head. You might have more luck with these codec questions on the QuickTime- API list. You can add yourself here: Animation and None are 8-bit RGB[A] codecs. If you need an RGB[A] QuickTime codec with 10 bits of precision per channel, try Sheer RGB[A] 10bf. It's only free for the first 20 days of use, but it's truly lossless, it's really fast, and it's cross-platform. I tried the Difference matte technique you suggested to test a number of QuickTime codecs, including the Animation codec. None of them were lossless. Actually, it's kind of scary that QuickTime does not have a single codec that is completely lossless... even the "uncompressed" were lossy. I used a 10 bit DPX 1920x1080p 24.0 fps sequence as source footage, which I've just received from a recent music video shoot, shot on a stage. The goal is to convert it into a single QuickTime ".mov" file, with lossless compression (or even no compression). I couldn't achieve that goal. Here are the codecs that I tested: Animation (at best setting) - truncates off the bottom 2 bits (10 bit - > 8 bit), which is lossy. None - Exact same results as Animation. 8-bit only. truncated bottom 2 bits. Lossy. (Differencing the Animation and None codecs to each other gives 0's-- exact match.) FCP Uncompressed 422 10 bit - differences at all edges (to be expected, 444->422 issue) DNxHD 10 bit 709 - Noisiest of these codecs. (Noisy into top 8 bits.) Blocking artifacts, especially in the vertically oriented direction. Lossy. Apple Pro Res HQ - slightly noisier than FCP Uncompressed 422, but similar 444->422 lossy results. Apple Pro Res 4444 codec - least lossy of the codecs I tested. Appears to have saved full 10 bits. (Did not just truncate down to 8. Possibly can do 16->16 bit?) Noisy in bottom bits, though. Lossy. NOTE: The Apple Pro Res 4444 codec has a bug, in that it does not appear to do the right thing if it is given an image that does not have an alpha channel. And there is no option in the codec UI to automatically add a fully opaque alpha channel. (It would be very nice to have that option.) When I layer two copies of the SAME resulting ProRes 4444 video on top of each other, and toggle visibility of the top layer On & Off -- they do not match! There is a brightness/contrast difference, which appears to be stemming from the alpha. For my 10 bit 444 source video, Pro Res 4444 was less lossy than "Uncompressed", "None", and "Animation". "Lossless" QT codecs appear to only be lossless for 8 bit video, not anything above 8 bits. Ditto for 444 video ... where even "Uncompressed" is quite lossy. Both were rather jarring surprises. -- Brian This email sent to hd444@mac.com This email sent to dcardani@apple.com This email sent to site_archiver@lists.apple.com