site_archiver@lists.apple.com Delivered-To: pro-apps-dev@lists.apple.com User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110617 Thunderbird/3.1.11 There seems to be a difference in image orientation between FCPX and Motion5. I noticed in Motion 5 that both point controls and images seemed to be interpreted up-side-down from the way I was doing things (in my stuff the top-left pixel is point 0,0). So I reversed the y axis for points and began walking images from bottom up and now my effect matches up in Motion 5. However in FCPX something is now backward - it's either the points or the images, but I can't tell from the image row data pointers where the image origin is. Anyone have any clue about each is supposed to work, and how you're supposed to tell which way the origin is? - Nathan _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Pro-apps-dev mailing list (Pro-apps-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/pro-apps-dev/site_archiver%40lists.ap... On 08/08/2011 12:49 PM, Paul Miller wrote: The images are flipped differently in FCP and Motion. You can find out which way they are oriented by calling [FxImage origin]. This email sent to site_archiver@lists.apple.com