site_archiver@lists.apple.com Delivered-To: pro-apps-dev@lists.apple.com Hi, no flames but: PG On 09/10/2008, at 3:18 PM, Robert Thompson wrote: _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Pro-apps-dev mailing list (Pro-apps-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/pro-apps-dev/site_archiver%40lists.ap... 1. A rank-and-file Apple employee will not EVER comment on the future of a product. Are you sure you're thinking of the same company? 2. Motion strikes me as being very much a pixel-oriented program, not vector, and not very programmable 3. Particle Illusion is indeed very amazing. Only a little more amazing than it was when I first saw it 5 years ago in Combustion, and ten years ago when it was first released. It doesn't have anything to do with motion, necessarily. (You might want to take a look at Quartz Composer ... these are old but impress the hell out of me: http://www.zugakousaku.com/index.php?ref=study-quartz ) I had an interesting conversation from someone on this list the other day, I think it was Jon Bradley about motion. This email sent to site_archiver@lists.apple.com