site_archiver@lists.apple.com Delivered-To: pro-apps-dev@lists.apple.com User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110812 Thunderbird/6.0 Here's what our Rigging and Publishing guy says: He is close. The problem is that the "value" of the parameters mentioned in his point #2 and #3 are treated as indices into the table of targets from point #1. Deleting a parameter from the targets means that the indices of parameters with values> the deleted index have to be updated. Yes - thank you! _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Pro-apps-dev mailing list (Pro-apps-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/pro-apps-dev/site_archiver%40lists.ap... On 8/31/2011 7:28 PM, Darrin Cardani wrote: Also, 240 variations on the same effect? Rigging is supposed to allow for variations on the same effect, so that might help, perhaps that would better serve him than 240 separate Motion templates. Does that help? I did a FCPX-compatible version of our PhotoCopy product, where each "preset" is a different look model derived from source images. There is a thumbnail and unique look for each one, so I don't think I could have done it with rigging. This email sent to site_archiver@lists.apple.com