site_archiver@lists.apple.com Delivered-To: pro-apps-dev@lists.apple.com Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=qgOL/y1PhZ61Xz0Pxgt4WMPK47GRG7pRBR/53QPrm9kqtGX7mT3pnXBD3BjOiWtS; h=Received:Message-Id:From:To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:X-Mailer:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP; [outputImage fieldOrder] == kFxFieldOrder_PROGRESSIVE [inputImage fieldOrder] != kFxFieldOrder_PROGRESSIVE renderInfo. fieldOrder == kFxFieldOrder_PROGRESSIVE This has confused me some, but I have adapted my code. Now for my question. Steve Meyer _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Pro-apps-dev mailing list (Pro-apps-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/pro-apps-dev/site_archiver%40lists.ap... When an interlaced clip is rendered in a progressive sequence, I see the following results for fieldOrder in renderOutput The heights and rowbytes of inputImage and outputImage are the same, i.e not half height for inputImage But, if I call [temporalAPI getInputBitmap], the resulting bitmap has 1/2 height and rowBytes twice of the inputImage, ie half height image and [inputImage fieldOrder] != kFxFieldOrder_PROGRESSIVE but [inputImage fieldOrder] == kFxField_NONE Has inputImage automatically been deinterlaced? In other words, has any deinterlacing processing been applied to the inputImage as a default without the user specifically applying a deinterlace filter. I am working on plugins with conditional deinterlacing code in the filters, and my client is seeing results that appear to indicate the input was already deinterlaced. This email sent to site_archiver@lists.apple.com