On 5/12/2014 12:00 PM, Peter Litwinowicz wrote: Given all the garbage frame bugs that lasted until maybe FCP 10.0.7, Just to be clear here (for the newer developers), these bugs only seemed to show themselves when retrieving OGL Textures from FCP and not CPU RAM images. Pete On May 9, 2014, at 1:28 PM, Peter Litwinowicz <pete@revisionfx.com <mailto:pete@revisionfx.com>> wrote: What we are mostly talking about is creating previous Motion templates for use in previous versions of FCP. That said, most of our users will ONLY have FCP and not Motion. So what to do then? There's no way for them to create templates. We are mostly talking about old versions of FCP that can only load older Motion template versions… so we want an older version of Motion to create templates for those older versions of FCP. Pete From:Dieter Becker <dieterdavebecker@gmail.com <mailto:dieterdavebecker@gmail.com>> Date:Friday, May 9, 2014 1:14 PM To:<pro-apps-dev@lists.apple.com <mailto:pro-apps-dev@lists.apple.com>> Subject:Re: Pro-apps-dev Digest, Vol 11, Issue 20 Hi, if the user/client can’t/won’t update and still has the Motion version that you don’t. Then just ask him to create the template himself. Creating a template is easier than getting email Mail. I take that the cases where one cannot update for some reason, are few. So - perhaps in those cases, take 2 minutes to describe to the user how to create the template himself with your plug-in. My 2 Cents anyway — Best Morten _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Pro-apps-dev mailing list (Pro-apps-dev@lists.apple.com <mailto:Pro-apps-dev@lists.apple.com>) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/pro-apps-dev/pete%40revisionfx.com This email sent topete@revisionfx.com <mailto:pete@revisionfx.com> _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Pro-apps-dev mailing list (Pro-apps-dev@lists.apple.com <mailto:Pro-apps-dev@lists.apple.com>) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/pro-apps-dev/garrick%40digitalanarch... This email sent togarrick@digitalanarchy.com <mailto:garrick@digitalanarchy.com> _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Pro-apps-dev mailing list (Pro-apps-dev@lists.apple.com <mailto:Pro-apps-dev@lists.apple.com>) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/pro-apps-dev/pete%40revisionfx.com This email sent to pete@revisionfx.com <mailto:pete@revisionfx.com> _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Pro-apps-dev mailing list (Pro-apps-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/pro-apps-dev/paul%40fxtech.com This email sent to paul@fxtech.com _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Pro-apps-dev mailing list (Pro-apps-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/pro-apps-dev/site_archiver%40lists.a... This email sent to site_archiver@lists.apple.com Yes but the CPU/software mode got horribly slow around the 10.0.5-10.0.6 time-frame, making pure-software effects practically useless from an efficiency point of view. I verified that even a "do nothing" CPU effect had like 300-500ms of overhead.