site_archiver@lists.apple.com Delivered-To: webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com Does this sound attractive? Not worth the trouble? Richard Palmer _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/site_archiver%40lists.... Do any of the mavens who subscribe to this list have an opinion about the utility of using Derby né Cloudscape as a WebObjects database (assuming a plugin was written). When the source is released, one could make a framework and incorporate Derby as an embedded database in a WebObjects application. This would permit debugging with a java debugger on both sides of the EnterpriseObjects frameworks. Also, one could distribute applications as one package without worrying about providing for database connectivity. If one deployed as a war, you could plunk the app into JBoss or even Tomcat with minimal deployment descriptors. This email sent to site_archiver@lists.apple.com