Re: LyX under X11 behaviour
Re: LyX under X11 behaviour
- Subject: Re: LyX under X11 behaviour
- From: Michael Reilly <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 16:53:25 -0700
Mark E. Perkins wrote:
> On 2007/07/13 14:42, Rich Cook wrote:
>> I thought the only emacs that opens X windows is called xemacs. What
>> happens if you type "which emacs"? I suspect you are aliased or
>> symlinked to xemacs.
>>
>
> The emacs that Apple distributes (/usr/bin/emacs) is GNU Emacs that is not
> X-enabled.
I did not know that this actually worked. It has been possible to configure
emacs to leave out X11 support when building but over the past 10 - 12 years of
building emacs that option has not produced a working terminal only emacs for me.
michael
> One can (and many folks do) build an X-enabled GNU Emacs. All of
> that is just a long way of saying XEmacs != X-enabled Emacs (though XEmacs is
> certainly X-enabled).
>
> Mark
>
> _______________________________________________
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> X11-users mailing list (email@hidden)
>
> This email sent to email@hidden
--
---- ---- ----
Michael Reilly email@hidden
Sedona, Arizona
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
X11-users mailing list (email@hidden)
This email sent to email@hidden