Re: IGLX is NOT going away
Re: IGLX is NOT going away
- Subject: Re: IGLX is NOT going away
- From: René J.V. Bertin <email@hidden>
- Date: Sat, 28 May 2016 12:07:05 +0200
On Friday May 27 2016 16:49:57 Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia wrote:
> I think you can just edit /opt/X11/bin/startx and add +iglx to defaultserverargs if you want to test this out.
FWIW, this can be done with 2.7.8 too.
A remote glxinfo from Linux tells me this:
%> env LIBGL_DEBUG=verbose glxinfo
libGL: OpenDriver: trying /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/dri/tls/swrast_dri.so
libGL: OpenDriver: trying /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/dri/swrast_dri.so
libGL: driver does not expose __driDriverGetExtensions_swrast(): /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/dri/swrast_dri.so: undefined symbol: __driDriverGetExtensions_swrast
libGL error: failed to load driver: swrast
name of display: portia:0.0
display: portia:0 screen: 0
direct rendering: No (If you want to find out why, try setting LIBGL_DEBUG=verbose)
server glx vendor string: SGI
server glx version string: 1.4
server glx extensions:
GLX_ARB_multisample, GLX_EXT_import_context, GLX_EXT_visual_info,
GLX_EXT_visual_rating, GLX_OML_swap_method, GLX_SGIS_multisample,
GLX_SGIX_fbconfig
[...]OpenGL vendor string: Intel Inc.
OpenGL renderer string: Intel HD Graphics 3000 OpenGL Engine
OpenGL version string: 1.4 (2.1 INTEL-8.24.17)
Does the undefined symbol error stem from an issue on my Linux system or is it in fact due do XQuartz?
R.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
X11-users mailing list (email@hidden)
This email sent to email@hidden