Re: IGLX is NOT going away
Re: IGLX is NOT going away
- Subject: Re: IGLX is NOT going away
- From: Rich Cook <email@hidden>
- Date: Sat, 28 May 2016 06:54:59 -0700
> On May 28, 2016, at 2:12 AM, René J.V. Bertin <email@hidden> wrote:
>
> On Friday May 27 2016 16:49:57 Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia wrote:
>> I think you can just edit /opt/X11/bin/startx and add +iglx to defaultserverargs if you want to test this out. Please give that a test and file a bug report if that's what works for you, and I'll try to get that gated by a defaults option in the next beta.
>
> That's interesting, I thought that XQuartz never supported remote GL in either direction?
Wrong. In 2.7.8 it's there. In 2.7.9 it's not.
>
> I presume that the effect of +iglx also shows up in the output of xdpyinfo and/or glxinfo?
XQuartz 2.7.9 with +iglx should act the same as XQuartz 2.7.8 without it.
> R.
> _______________________________________________
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> X11-users mailing list (email@hidden)
>
> This email sent to email@hidden
—————
Cheers from Rich Cook
===============================
Success is the ability to go from one failure to the next with no loss of enthusiasm. --Winston Churchill
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
X11-users mailing list (email@hidden)
This email sent to email@hidden