Archiving performance (was: Re: (no subject))
Archiving performance (was: Re: (no subject))
- Subject: Archiving performance (was: Re: (no subject))
- From: Ambroise Confetti <email@hidden>
- Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2003 12:45:10 +0100
Le 8 nov. 03, ` 10:12, Alastair Houghton a icrit :
>
There have been previous comments about the performance of
>
NSKeyedArchiver as compared with other techniques. As far as I
>
recall, the problem with it is that it has to do a lot of work to
>
ensure that it doesn't fall foul of loops in your object graph...
>
anyway, search the archives for more information on this one.
Thanks, I will browse the archives.
However, I can give a first partial answer to my question: by switching
the archive format from binary to XML, it takes 3.5 seconds instead of
23, but produces a file that is 10 times bigger.
That doesn't suit me though... But I think that's a strange behavior.
Ambroise
http://www.cellulo.info/
ICQ 4508259
AIM atvaark
[demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type text/directory which had a name of Ambroise Confetti.vcf]
_______________________________________________
cocoa-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/cocoa-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.