Re: ZeroLink and dynamic discovered Classes
Re: ZeroLink and dynamic discovered Classes
- Subject: Re: ZeroLink and dynamic discovered Classes
- From: Martin Häcker <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 19:18:28 +0100
In any case, I tend to think that having both ZeroLink and Unit
testing is not such an interesting option. One good practice of Unit
Testing is to make sure that all your tests pass when you make
changes in the code. Now if you break on a failed test, fix the
code, and continue, you would have to rerun all the tests that
passed before your change anyway. IMHO it means that it's much
simpler to let the tests run, make your changes, rebuild and retest
everything.
Ups, did I mix this up? I thought ZeroLink was the technology that
speeds up the fix, build, run cycle while "Fix and Continue" whas
this whacky stuff I don't really need?
cu Martin
--
dont.wanna.tell
[ot]coder - hehe
_______________________________________________
cocoa-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/cocoa-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.