Re: Cocoa Bindings - nondebuggable, non-obvious, procedural ???
Re: Cocoa Bindings - nondebuggable, non-obvious, procedural ???
- Subject: Re: Cocoa Bindings - nondebuggable, non-obvious, procedural ???
- From: Will Mason <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:02:02 -0800 (PST)
- Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
> In other words, the point of that message was that the way objects
> communicate with each other is orthogonal to whether or not they are
> in
> fact objects. The fact that you came away thinking that it had
> nothing
> to do with object orientation either means I proved my point or I was
>
> as clear as mud.
I was having the same thought (that you proved your point, not that you
were clear as mud). Perhaps we can say with certainty at this point
that KVC and object-orientation are orthogonal (and transparent) to
each other. The fact that you can express KVC using an object-oriented
language means nothing. It's like saying that you can describe how to
do an appendectomy in both English and Spanish and you'll still be able
to to an appendectomy no matter which one you choose. Am I getting it?
Take care,
Will
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden