• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Cocoa bindings one- or bi-directional
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Cocoa bindings one- or bi-directional


  • Subject: Re: Cocoa bindings one- or bi-directional
  • From: Scott Anguish <email@hidden>
  • Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 05:39:47 -0400


On May 27, 2005, at 5:33 AM, mmalcolm crawford wrote:


On May 27, 2005, at 2:17 AM, Scott Anguish wrote:


You bind an attribute of a UI widget to the property of a model object...

    picking one further nit on this..
    Always, always use a controller.


Oh, indeed --- controller taken as read!  :-)

So, Scott, people sometimes ask, "What are the benefits of using a controller?  Don't they just get in the way?"  What would you say to these people?  ;-)

If ever there was a setup...

    Suck it up and use them cuz Andreas said so? :-)  I guess that only sticks for those of us who are were in that meeting....

    Controllers implement the NSEditor/NSEditorRegistration protocols.  That means that they correctly handle the cases when documents revert, or save, and forward the correct notifications to the model/view items when that happens.  This way models get any uncommitted edits, and can handle them appropriately. 

    Apple doesn't endorse or recommend connecting UI to model directly, nor model<->model bindings






-- 
"William Cheeseman ... is said not to be a doofus in real life."
  - Roger Ebert, Chicago Sun-Times Online, Jan 8, 1998

 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Cocoa-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Cocoa bindings one- or bi-directional
      • From: Tim Lucas <email@hidden>
    • Re: Cocoa bindings one- or bi-directional
      • From: Kay Roepke <email@hidden>
    • Re: Cocoa bindings one- or bi-directional
      • From: Gwynne <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Cocoa bindings one- or bi-directional (From: Zdzislaw Losvik <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Cocoa bindings one- or bi-directional (From: Kay Roepke <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Cocoa bindings one- or bi-directional (From: mmalcolm crawford <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Cocoa bindings one- or bi-directional (From: mmalcolm crawford <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Cocoa bindings one- or bi-directional (From: Scott Anguish <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Cocoa bindings one- or bi-directional (From: mmalcolm crawford <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Cocoa bindings one- or bi-directional
  • Next by Date: Re: Cocoa bindings one- or bi-directional
  • Previous by thread: Re: Cocoa bindings one- or bi-directional
  • Next by thread: Re: Cocoa bindings one- or bi-directional
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread