Re: Objective-C or Objective-C++
Re: Objective-C or Objective-C++
- Subject: Re: Objective-C or Objective-C++
- From: Thomas Engelmeier <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2006 20:18:47 +0100
On 03.02.2006, at 18:20, Glen Simmons wrote:
A valid C source is not always a valid C++ source. Especially if
it contains abnomiations like pointers to distictive types
assigned back and forth to void pointers, left alone function
pointers passed as void pointers..
Regards
Tom"Surprise, surprise, 'id' is typedef for 'void *' "E
Uh, no. id is a pointer to a struct. See <objc/objc.h>
Oh, OK. I guess I've been too long this week porting WIN32 code that
defines bool, BOOL, true, false, YES, NO, passes PTMF's through void
* and lost a pile of the fixed stuff due to XCode deadlocking before
some files were saved.
Regards,
Tom"Carefully looking around the corner and below the chair if there
is really no evil from outer code space hiding"E
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden