• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Marketshare of Mac OS 10.4 vs. pre-10.4
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Marketshare of Mac OS 10.4 vs. pre-10.4


  • Subject: Re: Marketshare of Mac OS 10.4 vs. pre-10.4
  • From: Andrew Carter <email@hidden>
  • Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 12:36:31 -0700

I wouldn't use this as a sole source but it does make a strong case that Tiger only isn't that bad. I'm facing a similar decision. Core Data may free me from writing massive amounts of code so I may have no choice but to pick Tiger. Plus, if you are looking at an app that won't release for at least 3+ months, Leopard is looming on the horizon. This means you would really be supporting Tiger + Leopard. Many of the indie developers seem to use the current - 1 rule (i.e. Tiger, Panther).

These stats are interesting but there is one thing that concerns me about them. 30%+ of the users are on Radeon x1600. That means 30% of the Omni users bought new hardware in the past few months (and means they are running Tiger). Omni bundles their software on new Mac's. That could be skewing the numbers as well.

One last point. I think this came from Wil Shipley. His argument was that if you are selling commercial software, you should target the people that are going to pay you money. What he meant was that users that are still on Jaguar (or even Panther) are less likely to pay money to buy your application. They are indeed potential customers but they obviously have reasons why they don't want to spend even on Apple software. I think that it could mean you serve your customers better by catering to what they have. In Omni's case, they clearly should leverage all the Tiger features they can - their user base is overwhelmingly up to date. No sense in putting out effort for Panther users unless their is another statistic that says that there is a large Panther user base that is still waiting to upgrade (which I would submit is doubtful).

Andrew


On May 8, 2006, at 12:23 PM, j o a r wrote:


On 8 maj 2006, at 21.17, Eric wrote:

I'm wondering what's the current market share statistic for users of Mac OS 10.4 versus previous versions of Mac OS X?

It certainly depends on what type of software / users you're talking about!
One interesting source of information are the statistics published by OmniGroup:


<http://update.omnigroup.com/>

j o a r


_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden

_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden
  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Marketshare of Mac OS 10.4 vs. pre-10.4
      • From: "Timothy J. Wood" <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Marketshare of Mac OS 10.4 vs. pre-10.4 (From: Eric <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Marketshare of Mac OS 10.4 vs. pre-10.4 (From: j o a r <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: accessing iTunes via Applescript while a Cocoa visualization plugin is running
  • Next by Date: [Moderator] EOT Re: Marketshare of Mac OS 10.4 vs. pre-10.4
  • Previous by thread: Re: Marketshare of Mac OS 10.4 vs. pre-10.4
  • Next by thread: Re: Marketshare of Mac OS 10.4 vs. pre-10.4
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread