Lists

Terms and Conditions
Lists hosted on this site
Email the Postmaster
Tips for posting to public mailing lists

Re: What's so special about NSString literals? (RE: memory management)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: What's so special about NSString literals? (RE: memory management)

Subject: Re: What's so special about NSString literals? (RE: memory management)
From: Nick Zitzmann <email@hidden>
Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 10:56:20 -0600


On May 17, 2006, at 10:48 AM, Eric wrote:

So they are never deallocated throughout the program's lifetime?

Correct; they are members of the class NSConstantString (which is a concrete subclass of NSString) and their retain count is always UINT_MAX, so you can send a -release message to one but it won't do anything.

Nick Zitzmann
<http://www.chronosnet.com/>


_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Cocoa-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden



References:  
  >What's so special about NSString literals? (RE: memory management) (From: Eric <email@hidden>)
  >Re: What's so special about NSString literals? (RE: memory	management) (From: Nick Zitzmann <email@hidden>)
  >Re: What's so special about NSString literals? (RE: memory	management) (From: Eric <email@hidden>)




Prev by Date:
resetCursorRects being called too often?

Next by Date:
Re: A word of caution...

Previous by thread:
Re: What's so special about NSString literals? (RE: memory	management)

Next by thread:
Re: What's so special about NSString literals? (RE: memory	management)

Index(es):

Date
Thread