Lists

Terms and Conditions
Lists hosted on this site
Email the Postmaster
Tips for posting to public mailing lists

Re: Runtime difference on "some" hardware? (Was: Re: Instance method declaration)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Runtime difference on "some" hardware? (Was: Re: Instance method declaration)

Subject: Re: Runtime difference on "some" hardware? (Was: Re: Instance method declaration)
From: Nick Zitzmann <email@hidden>
Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 22:41:19 -0600


On May 21, 2006, at 10:27 PM, Sherm Pendley wrote:

More importantly, on some hardware platforms, different Objective- C runtime functions are called based on the expected return type of the message being sent.
On *some* platforms? That makes me nervous...

Yep. According to /usr/include/objc/objc-runtime.h, on Intel, one has to use objc_msgSend_fpret() to call methods that return floating point values on Intel only.

Nick Zitzmann
<http://www.chronosnet.com/>


_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Cocoa-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


Follow-Ups:

Re: Runtime difference on "some" hardware? (Was: Re: Instance	method declaration)
From: Sherm Pendley <email@hidden>


References:  
  >Re: Instance method declaration (From: Erik Buck <email@hidden>)
  >Runtime difference on "some" hardware? (Was: Re: Instance method	declaration) (From: Sherm Pendley <email@hidden>)




Prev by Date:
Runtime difference on "some" hardware? (Was: Re: Instance method	declaration)

Next by Date:
Re: Runtime difference on "some" hardware? (Was: Re: Instance	method declaration)

Previous by thread:
Runtime difference on "some" hardware? (Was: Re: Instance method	declaration)

Next by thread:
Re: Runtime difference on "some" hardware? (Was: Re: Instance	method declaration)

Index(es):

Date
Thread