• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: FYI - installer packages are the preferred deployment method now
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: FYI - installer packages are the preferred deployment method now


  • Subject: Re: FYI - installer packages are the preferred deployment method now
  • From: Wade Tregaskis <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2007 17:22:46 -0800

Play with the new package maker to understand its capabilities before you go off hating installers :)

This is completely irrelevant. As an end-user I presume Installer.app works just fine, in any case. What matters is that if I download some random app, and it demands it be installed before I can run it, my thought process is something like:


1) Is this app Adobe CS3, a system utility likely to have kexts or similar, or the ultimate killer app that I just promised my first born for?
If yes, either install or - if it's an unfamiliar app, fire up Pacifist to see wtf it's going to muck with, first.
If no, delete.


There are legitimate scenarios where you do need a formal installation process. But the fact that such a mechanism exists, officially, is being abused by some people whom are perhaps too busy, lazy, naive or uncaring to write their apps better.

Wade

P.S. There are arguments to be made in favour on an installer, if that installer is large but downloads dependencies iff necessary, or similar smarts that ultimately save me time. In my experience this is very much a niche area for the average end-user.
P.P.S. CS3 is an arbitrary exemplar exception to cover those suites that have shared frameworks and whatnot. Yet, Microsoft Office is a counter-example; it supports drag-and-drop installation. Installing Office is much faster and easier than CS3.
P.P.P.S. I'm not experienced with it, but I gather packages are convenient for remotely managed machines, with ARD and whatnot. Logically it follows, then, that there is a nice convenient package maker for system admins.
_______________________________________________


Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)

Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com

Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


References: 
 >FYI - installer packages are the preferred deployment method now (From: Shawn Erickson <email@hidden>)
 >Re: FYI - installer packages are the preferred deployment method now (From: Andreas Mayer <email@hidden>)
 >Re: FYI - installer packages are the preferred deployment method now (From: Shawn Erickson <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: [Moderator] Re: FYI - installer packages are the preferred deployment method now
  • Next by Date: Re: FYI - installer packages are the preferred deployment method now
  • Previous by thread: Re: FYI - installer packages are the preferred deployment method now
  • Next by thread: Re: FYI - installer packages are the preferred deployment method now
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread