Re: Interface Builder "layout" versus "frame"
Re: Interface Builder "layout" versus "frame"
- Subject: Re: Interface Builder "layout" versus "frame"
- From: "Ken Ferry" <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2007 13:41:49 -0800
Hi John,
Sorry; this is a long standing request, but this information isn't
available. IB isn't retrieving the info from the frameworks, it has
its own internal rules.
-Ken
Cocoa Frameworks
On Nov 8, 2007 10:26 AM, John Stiles <email@hidden> wrote:
> I've noticed that Interface Builder shows not only a "frame" value
> for object sizes, but also a "layout" value.
>
> I am trying to create a few controls programatically and it seems
> like I'd get results a lot closer to what I'm expecting if I could
> create them with a "layout" rectangle instead of a "frame" rectangle.
> For instance, if I make an NSTabView, it's significantly inset
> compared to the NSRect I've set. But if I go into IB and create a tab
> control and set up its "layout" rectangle to match what I want, the
> positioning is perfect.
>
> So programatically, how do I work with "layout" rectangles instead of
> "frames"?
>
> I know that technically I could just hard-code the margin sizes of
> controls but I am hoping to avoid this… it doesn't seem future-proof.
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
>
> Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
> Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
>
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>
> This email sent to email@hidden
>
_______________________________________________
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden