Re: Cheap quality improvements (was Re: !foo vs foo == nil)
Re: Cheap quality improvements (was Re: !foo vs foo == nil)
- Subject: Re: Cheap quality improvements (was Re: !foo vs foo == nil)
- From: Scott Ribe <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 18:00:15 -0600
- Thread-topic: Cheap quality improvements (was Re: !foo vs foo == nil)
> Speaking as a battle-hardened QA manager, the one simple step of
> turning on all warnings and removing them
Absolutely. Which is why pointless warnings really annoy me!
FYI, I'm not talking about Xcode/gcc here. I'm thinking of an old version of
Watcom, in which a warning was generated for every case of a child class not
overriding a descendant's virtual method! (Note: virtual, not pure virtual
which of course was an error.)
And these days I have ****loads of deprecated warnings that I won't be able
to deal with for a while yet, which sometimes obscure useful warning about
actual mistakes... Oh well...
--
Scott Ribe
email@hidden
http://www.killerbytes.com/
(303) 722-0567 voice
_______________________________________________
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden