Re: Implementing isEqual: and hash
Re: Implementing isEqual: and hash
- Subject: Re: Implementing isEqual: and hash
- From: Graham Cox <email@hidden>
- Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 22:22:41 +1000
On 23 Aug 2008, at 10:13 pm, Michael Ash wrote:
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 7:41 AM, Graham Cox <email@hidden>
wrote:
I have a class for which equality can be defined as having the same
internal
string value (which happens to be a UUID-turned-string). I can easily
implement isEqual: based on that but the docs say I also need to
implement
-hash. Any pointers on what is a good way to do that? Could I just
safely
defer to the -hash returned by the string in question?
The implementation of -hash should *always* match the implementation
of -isEqual:.
If you compare primitives in -isEqual:, you should combine them (using
xor or the like) in -hash. If you compare objects by calling -isEqual:
on them, you should combine their hashes (using xor or the like). If
you do some of each, combine them all. If you compare only one thing
for equality, return it (if it's a primitive) or its hash value (if
you call isEqual: on it).
Thanks guys - works fine.
cheers, Graham
_______________________________________________
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden