• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Daemon vs. Keychain
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Daemon vs. Keychain


  • Subject: Re: Daemon vs. Keychain
  • From: Karl Moskowski <email@hidden>
  • Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 11:34:43 -0400

On 28-Mar-08, at 11:22 AM, Derek Chesterfield wrote:
If this is Leopard, then signing the executable should avoid this problem.

Yes, it's Leopard-only. I was going to put off signing until I got further along in development. I guess I'm going to have to dig into that now.


I believe that the System keychain is readable by any admin, and any admin on your Mac could retrieve the data in the keychain item. Personally I'd have security questions about that, but it depends on your application whether it is a concern.

No, it's not a concern (yet, at least).

And thanks, Derek.

----
Karl Moskowski <email@hidden>
Voodoo Ergonomics Inc. <http://voodooergonomics.com/>

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________

Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)

Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com

Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

References: 
 >Daemon vs. Keychain (From: Karl Moskowski <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: changing NSNumber from within another function
  • Next by Date: Re: Daemon vs. Keychain
  • Previous by thread: Daemon vs. Keychain
  • Next by thread: Re: Daemon vs. Keychain
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread