Lists

Terms and Conditions
Lists hosted on this site
Email the Postmaster
Tips for posting to public mailing lists

Re: executables for OSX 10.4 vs 10.5

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: executables for OSX 10.4 vs 10.5

Subject: Re: executables for OSX 10.4 vs 10.5
From: Thomas Engelmeier <email@hidden>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 10:21:25 +0200


Am 17.10.2008 um 01:24 schrieb Stefan Werner:

The only drawback is you get partially buggy, backward compatible behavior on Leopard when you link against the 10.4 SDK.
Can you elaborate? I was under the naive assumption that as long as I don't use any 10.5-only APIs the 10.4 SDK and the 10.5 SDK should behave the same.


Simple example:

IIRC, the result of
[[NSNumber numberWithUnsignedShort:0x8000] intValue];

varies depending on the SDK linked against. 10.4 gives you a sign extension and a negative value, 10.5 returns 0x8000.


_______________________________________________

Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)

Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com

Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden



References:  
  >Re: executables for OSX 10.4 vs 10.5 (From: Thomas Engelmeier <email@hidden>)
  >Re: executables for OSX 10.4 vs 10.5 (From: Stefan Werner <email@hidden>)




Prev by Date:
Core Data: The file is not in the right format - sometimes!

Next by Date:
How can I find app bundle with its identifier. App is not running.

Previous by thread:
Re: executables for OSX 10.4 vs 10.5

Next by thread:
how to complete c/s app

Index(es):

Date
Thread