Re: Garbage collected and non-garbage collected
Re: Garbage collected and non-garbage collected
- Subject: Re: Garbage collected and non-garbage collected
- From: Robert Mullen <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 11:47:19 -0700
Too little resource, too little experience, too little return. The
first two are because this is a skunk works type corporate project
that basically has myself (an ex-.NET and general Windows coder) as
it's resource so is constrained by me. The third is because I don't
see sufficient gain to doing all the memory management myself. GC
systems have become efficient enough in our modern world that I think
manual memory management has become pretty specialized and out of
place in 80% of desktop applications. Certainly there is the other 20%
of high performance and real time situations but mine is basically a
pretty face on a database. Anybody want to argue the other direction?
I am always willing to learn.
On Mar 10, 2009, at 11:39 AM, I. Savant wrote:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 2:16 PM, Robert Mullen <email@hidden>
wrote:
Going non-GC is not an option for our main project
If you don't mind my asking ... why? Too much work invested?
--
I.S.
_______________________________________________
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden