Re: Gold resolution
Re: Gold resolution
- Subject: Re: Gold resolution
- From: "Adriano Von Markendorf" <email@hidden>
- Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2002 01:21:24 -0300
>
The only thing that's certain in all this is that anything over 2.5x
>
the linescreen will be discarded in the RIP.
I agree.
>
Various people have 'proved' mathematically that anything over 1.414x
>
the linescreen is unnecessary. But as you've noticed, it sometimes
>
doesn't look as good as 2x.
Yeah. It's a amazing thing !..I just read the article and keep my eyes in
every print material.
Your book Is the first print piece that can I note better details.
>
Generally, when theory conflicts with the data (as in, my eyes tell
>
me that 1.414x linescreen looks jaggy), I trust the data over the
>
theory.
Back to school...;-J
>
It's interesting -- we've used the same image in 5 editions of the
>
book. In three of them, we could see a difference between 2x and
>
1.5x, in the other two, we couldn't.
Really? It's very interesting....
>
I usually use 1.5x linescreen for close subjects with soft detail.
>
But if I have any doubt, I go to 2x. I don't think there's an
>
absolute way to determine the ideal screen/pixel ratio...
Ok. Nothing Its so great like real life experience.
Thanks to share your experience.
I will keep my attention on this phenomenon.
Regards,
Adriano von Markendorf email@hidden
"I-C-Cm vitamin's inside" Rio de Janeiro - Brazil
_______________________________________________
colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.