Re: Apple/Adobe Imaging, DAM and Workflow
Re: Apple/Adobe Imaging, DAM and Workflow
- Subject: Re: Apple/Adobe Imaging, DAM and Workflow
- From: Nick Dunmur <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 23:42:04 +0100
- Thread-topic: Apple/Adobe Imaging, DAM and Workflow
On 17/7/07 20:35, "Keith Cooper" wrote:
> Only if you want to -pay- to join in the 'discussion' :-)
Not so Keith. You can have a couple of weeks to try things out to see if you
like it. Pro Imaging is a very relaxed and extremely helpful and
authoritative bunch of image-makers. There would be plenty there that you
know of I am sure. Two weeks is a long enough time to get into a discussion.
Besides which, the fee includes many other benefits, not just the list. Pro
Imaging is more than that.
> And given you have to promise to never look at RF before you join, the
> prospect for much 'discussion' would perhaps seem somewhat limited? ...
Just because some photographers think that RF has undermined the value of
professional commissioned photography - and contributed to the general
lowering of standards in image-making and its perception, does not mean that
those people are not fully conversant with the reasons behind RF's 'success'
as a business model for the likes of Getty. There are plenty of people who
shoot RM stock only and believe that RF is an unsustainable business model
in the longer term - by which time the damage will well and truly have been
done.
Discussions 'for' and 'against' RF usually seem to end in impasse anyway -
if you've ever had the dubious pleasure of the AlamyPro forum, you'll know
what I mean
Kind regards
Nick D
--
Nick Dunmur - photographer
Nottingham,UK
+441159509685
info<at>nickdunmur.com
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden