• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: X-Rite iSis and dual measurements
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: X-Rite iSis and dual measurements


  • Subject: Re: X-Rite iSis and dual measurements
  • From: Dana Rasmussen <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 11:33:52 -0700
  • Thread-topic: X-Rite iSis and dual measurements

> 2. ProfileMaker:
> Using UVcut will produce only one set measurement -> more speed. ->
> save option: UVcut -> result = ICC profile
> Using NO will produce only one set measurement -> more speed. -> save
> option: noUVcut -> result = ICC profile
> For direct building of ICC profiles you don't need more options, so
> you'll get the same speed.
But what are we doing, precisely, here?
It does not activate the correct for optical brightener box in PMP, and it
does build a different profile.
In the example I just built using the compare function in Measuretool the
measurement files so no difference in densitometric measurements Delta E
2000 of 0 across the board.
Colorimetric shows average 1.22 with worst of 4.35.
Where is this data difference coming from? Is PMP averaging the two data
sets to create the profile?

Dana Rasmussen
Glazer¹s Camera
430 8th Ave. N
Seattle, WA 98109
206-624-1100 x1027
Fax 206-624-8065
email@hidden 




 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: X-Rite iSis and dual measurements
      • From: Klaus Karcher <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: X-Rite iSis and dual measurements (From: Beisch Clemens <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: X-Rite iSis and dual measurements
  • Next by Date: Re: X-Rite iSis and dual measurements
  • Previous by thread: Re: X-Rite iSis and dual measurements
  • Next by thread: Re: X-Rite iSis and dual measurements
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread