• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Accuracy of Instruments
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Accuracy of Instruments


  • Subject: Re: Accuracy of Instruments
  • From: Klaus Karcher <email@hidden>
  • Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2007 20:45:23 +0100

Mike Strickler wrote:

Wait a minute: "In all probability"? The "expert eye"? And "I guess"?

Would you please be so kind to /not/ truncate quotes beyond recognition?

... but back to the facts:

The University of Wuppertal, the University of applied Sicences Stuttgart and the FOGRA carried out an investigation about inter-instrument differences between 8 instruments of 5 manufacturers and presented the results at the 4. Digitalproof-Forum 2004 in Stuttgart.

The probes (BCRA tiles, digital proofs and offset prints on APCO paper) were measured with a reference instrument before and after the test to eliminate probes damaged during the test.

They result of the investigation was a Delta E 76 of up to 2 to the average on 95% confidence level. I think one can argue in good conscience that these differences are visible and significant in process control and quality management.

Klaus Karcher
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


References: 
 >Re: Accuracy of Instruments (From: Mike Strickler <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Accuracy of instruments
  • Next by Date: Re: Accuracy of Instruments
  • Previous by thread: Re: Accuracy of Instruments
  • Next by thread: Re: Accuracy of instruments
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread