• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Black and white negative scanning
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Black and white negative scanning


  • Subject: Re: Black and white negative scanning
  • From: "Richard Frederickson [Contr]" <email@hidden>
  • Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 10:17:31 -0500

My personal observation is that higher dynamic range scanners produce less noise in the image. Although the noise in a positive transparency falls in the shadow detail and is not often a factor--when you scan negatives it becomes a BIG issue, since now the noise is in your highlights and VERY noticeable.

In addition to negatives, I use my Imacon Flextight 949 scanner to capture histology specimens on 1"x3" glass slides. These stained specimens often exceed a density 4.0 (as well as having a "highlight" that is clear glass). Faint specimens are equally a challenge. Having a high dynamic range provides sensitivity in the highlight regions and the shadow regions without having to sacrifice either one--this saves a lot of time and frustration!

Richard

Richard Frederickson [Contractor]
Senior Technical Specialist
Scientific Publications, Graphics & Media (SPGM)
SAIC-Frederick, Inc.
National Cancer Institute at Frederick
Frederick, MD  21702-1201
(301) 846-1546

Visit us at http://web.ncifcrf.gov/spgm


On Nov 14, 2007, at 8:14 AM, Chris Protopapas wrote:

A dynamic range of 5.0? You're talking Status T densitometry? I find that hard to believe. That means the highlights would be blacker than the DMax of a transparency.

Ah ha - I thought someone would step up and say that! T grain films in our developer were constantly pushing the ~3.7 range of traditional scanners. I once had a B&W neg (I forget what it was) that I slapped on the densitometer and was blown away that it was almost 5.0. And yes it was clearly darker than common transparency DMax. Like I'm sure you do, I saw all kinds of crazy originals when I was a drum scan operator.


And while the common perception of liquid mounting is that it is a hassle - I personally find it a wonderful process that *saves* time that often leaves originals in a cleaner condition than they were prior.

Scott Martin
www.on-sight.com




_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


References: 
 >Re: Black and white negative scanning (From: Chris Protopapas <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Black and white negative scanning (From: Chris Protopapas <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Black and white negative scanning (From: Scott Martin <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Black and white negative scanning (From: Chris Protopapas <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Black and white negative scanning (From: Scott Martin <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Black and white negative scanning
  • Next by Date: Re: Black and white negative scanning
  • Previous by thread: Re: Black and white negative scanning
  • Next by thread: Re: Black and white negative scanning
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread