• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
RE: Black and white negative scanning
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Black and white negative scanning


  • Subject: RE: Black and white negative scanning
  • From: "Bertho Boman" <email@hidden>
  • Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 05:29:21 -0500

I did similar measurements on digital cameras using different lens types and
got surprisingly low dynamic range and posted it on a couple of user groups.

I got very little feedback which surprised me since it is of limited use
talking about lots of bit depth if in real life they are not useful.

Further, I never see this mention on camera and lens evaluations in
magazines and that is surprising too since there is a big difference between
different lenses and camera designs.

The significant feedback from the posts actually came from a camera
manufacturer, not users.

http://www.vinland.com/Contrast.html

Bertho



> -----Original Message-----
> From:   Jan-Willem Rossee     Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2007 04:19

> This is actually sort of semi-OT but it relates to the context of
> this discussion and is a matter of particular interest . The term
> dynamic range is very often "glossed over" by the marketing
> department or even stated misleadingly as maximum optical density.
> The optical density evaluation is nice to know but doesn't say
> anything about the effective performance of the scanner because in
> photography we are dealing with continous tone photographic media.
> The "dynamic range" specified by the manufacturers is usually the
> potential bitdepth from the A/D-converter, which is not the correct
> definition of dynamic range. It is the range between the darkest and
> brightest spots in the original and should be measured according to
> ISO 21550:2004 - methods for measuring and reporting the dynamic
> range of electronic scanners for continuous tone photographic media.
> Please don't get me wrong, a dmax of 4.0 is great, but only half the
> truth and no good when the effective dynamic range is just above 3.
> Only if the effective dynamic range of the scanner is equal to 4.0 or
> more the scanner will capture the full dynamic range of the original.
> Image Engineering, Dietmar Wueller evaluated the dynamic ranges with
> some popular scanners based on ISO 21550 --> http://
> digitalkamera.image-engineering.de/index.php/Publications
>
> Dynamic range IS a critical parameter especially when scanning B&W
> negs since they are indeed capable of exceeding most scanners dynamic
> ranges.
> Best,
> Jan-Willem Rossée


 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

References: 
 >Re: Black and white negative scanning (From: Jan-Willem Rossee <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Black and white negative scanning
  • Next by Date: Running a Sony Artisan on 64bit OS ?
  • Previous by thread: Re: Black and white negative scanning
  • Next by thread: Re: Black and white negative scanning
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread