Re: CIEDE2000 and CIELUV versus CIELAB
Re: CIEDE2000 and CIELUV versus CIELAB
- Subject: Re: CIEDE2000 and CIELUV versus CIELAB
- From: Roger Breton <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 20:36:07 -0500
> (Measure two colours and calculate dE according to dE(uv), dE(1994) and
> dE(2000) and you'll get three different answers. Which measurement is
> considered the best estimate/representation of typically perceived
> difference?)
>
> Steve
CIE Luv is a linear transformation of XYZ. As such, it does not have the
cube-root compression that CIELab has. Plus, it does not have at its root
the Munsell color system. So, perceptually, it is not better to describe
color differences than, say, CIE xy. dE94 and dE2000 are both 'weigthed'
color differences metrics. Heavily empirical. dE94 has its followers in the
automotive paint industry. dE2000 is the latest fad (don't mean that
derogatively). Keep in mind that many 'standards' and specifications are
still written with dEab -- even in 2008.
Roger Breton
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden