• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag
 

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Eye One Pro for monitor calibration? [was: Re: NEC 2690 SpectraView]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Eye One Pro for monitor calibration? [was: Re: NEC 2690 SpectraView]


  • Subject: Re: Eye One Pro for monitor calibration? [was: Re: NEC 2690 SpectraView]
  • From: David Scharf <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 18:34:26 -0800

Just wondered if anyone has tried out the new Spyder 3 yet. Same ole' stuff repackaged or new improved hardware?

Anyone?

Regards,

David Scharf
--

*DAVID SCHARF PHOTOGRAPHY*

Scanning Electron Microscopy

Los Angeles, CA 90039

http://www.scharfphoto.com

http://www.electronmicro.com







Martin Orpen wrote:
On 28 Nov 2007, at 00:10, Steven Kornreich wrote:

If this is the case, and I already own a eye one pro, is there any advantage
getting the more expensive one with the software and Calibrator?

Is it just me - or does anybody else think that the Eye One Pro is a disaster for monitor calibration?


Every time I've used an Eye One Pro to calibrate a monitor it produces a crap result. I've used a number of them - and seen the results of other people's use of them too.

Whenever I see a *calibrated* monitor which can't keep neutral in shadows (or show much shadow detail at all) it has normally been profiled using an Eye One Pro.

Cheaper devices do a much better job - DTP94 is (was) my particular favourite.

It might be that the three Eye One Pros that I have the pleasure of using for other things have all been somehow faulty when it comes to making monitor profiles? But I've got a sneaky suspicion that their responses to monitor stimulation isn't as good (and certainly not as uniform) as some people assume?

PS. Who cares if a monitor matches 96% of AdobeRGB anyhow? What kind of "standard" is AdobeRGB - the *standard* for lazy Photoshop users who don't know any better? That figure is as useful as the scanner manufacturers DMAX values...

PPS. The Eye One Pros were tested against the DTP94 on our monitors of choice: Quato - they're a bit like Eizos would be if Eizo gave any thought at all to product design... ;)

--Martin Orpen
Idea Digital Imaging Ltd


_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:


This email sent to email@hidden

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Eye One Pro for monitor calibration? [was: Re: NEC 2690 SpectraView]
      • From: Graeme Gill <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: NEC 2690 SpectraView (From: Andrew Rodney <email@hidden>)
 >Re: NEC 2690 SpectraView (From: Derrick Brown <email@hidden>)
 >RE: NEC 2690 SpectraView (From: "Steven Kornreich" <email@hidden>)
 >Eye One Pro for monitor calibration? [was: Re: NEC 2690 SpectraView] (From: Martin Orpen <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: OT: PM 4.1 Pro + EyeOne
  • Next by Date: iSis driver update
  • Previous by thread: Re: Eye One Pro for monitor calibration? [was: Re: NEC 2690 SpectraView]
  • Next by thread: Re: Eye One Pro for monitor calibration? [was: Re: NEC 2690 SpectraView]
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread