RE: Just how accurate we we need to be?
RE: Just how accurate we we need to be?
- Subject: RE: Just how accurate we we need to be?
- From: Roger <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 19:07:53 -0500
Terry,
I agree in the proofing world, the numbers are everything. And the limit are
the way various instruments all illuminate the same sample more or less the
same and detect optical radiation more or less the same. As long as there is
a single "standard" to simulate, things are manageable, with good proofing
paper and good RIP software, under good lighting. Where I find numbers
become meaningless is relating colors across various proofing systems, who
don't all use the same colorants, don't all have the same optical properties
and therefore will not record the same on all instruments.
Best / Roger
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden