Re: (no subject)
Re: (no subject)
- Subject: Re: (no subject)
- From: tahome izwah <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 06:49:04 +0200
It's not that I want to start a discussion, I simply don't understand
what you are saying. Are you saying that inplace stereo processing is
broken in Logic? That can't be, because it seems to work in the
products that I have developed.
--th
2009/6/22 john smith <email@hidden>:
>
> Yes, but inplace processing doesn't work when the input buffers are
> identical. So in my opinion, either it shouldn't bee allowed to have
> identical input buffers, or the system that makes the inplace processing
> should check, or at the very least it should be documented.
>
> Or to put it another way: Inplace processing means that the output and input
> buffers are identical, it doesn't mean "maybe your 2 output buffers are
> identical".
>
> Or yet another way of saying it: Nothing in the definition of inplace
> processing says it doesn't work with stereo effects.
>
> Again, just my opinion. I'm not prepared to go into a big discussion about
> it on the list (it's my experience that everything I say here seems to start
> a big discussion ;-)).
>
>
> Greets,
>
> Michael Olsen
> PhonoXone
>
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Coreaudio-api mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden