Re: Intel XNU bug report
Re: Intel XNU bug report
- Subject: Re: Intel XNU bug report
- From: almisr <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 12:18:42 +0200
Yep,
it was an abuse language ( for the first part ) as I answered Eric
I did not think that would create such a disorder :)
I'm not certain which Mike you're referring to, but if you mean me,
I should
point out that while I was involved with the effort to bring ACPI
to FreeBSD,
I have been no more than a spectator with regards to both its
integration
into Mac OS X and the 64-bit support work. Both of these were
undertaken
by great folks at Apple, and it would be grossly dishonest for me
to accept
any sort of credit for their hard work.
= Mike
Yep ,
you did quite a bit of the early integration of ACPI into FreeBSD,
Both of these were undertaken
by great folks at Apple
then thanks a lot to great Apple folks
:)
but that does not change my background-comment
if such a stupid code was present I believe as nobody
would have missed it ( great Apple folks included )
and OSX would not work ...
ACPI is large API, and requires a large work, one does not
contribute like that ...
I do not have the practice ( on other projects ) to see conclusions
also fast
and alien related BUGS.
it was just a little "irronic"
Best Regards , {|}
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Darwin-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden